JOURNEY RUNTIME CLAIM CHECK

Claim being considered:
-

Evidence class:
[ ] historical architecture
[ ] source code
[ ] database structure/data
[ ] local browser runtime
[ ] Android runtime
[ ] public web runtime
[ ] production deployment
[ ] end-to-end verified workflow

CURRENT KNOWN PRESERVED REALITY
- meuus.app production exists and is preserved.
- Supabase contains profile/path/task-related structures/data.
- authenticated Android Journey/task reads have accepted evidence.

DOES THE CLAIM GO FURTHER?
[ ] full synchronized 90-day product
[ ] automatic daily tracking
[ ] cross-device sync
[ ] notification/reminder engine
[ ] Garden/full gamification
[ ] AI Journey companion
[ ] automatic re-DLAS
[ ] validated scoring/personalization
[ ] practitioner/human-review system
[ ] payment/entitlement
[ ] other

If yes, what direct runtime evidence proves it?
-

CLASSIFICATION
[ ] Runtime verified
[ ] Source implemented
[ ] Database present
[ ] Partial
[ ] Manual
[ ] Pilot
[ ] In review
[ ] Historical architecture
[ ] Present but not verified
[ ] Not found

Rule:
Architecture ≠ runtime.
Database presence ≠ complete feature.
Local accepted runtime ≠ public production acceptance.
